For AMTSO to be trusted in the good things it claims to do…
There have been a few responses to my latest article on AMTSO; for example
- AMTSO revisited, Kurt Wismer
- I AMTSO confused…, David Harley
It’s worth reading them for an alternative view to mine; and if anyone comes across others, please add them as a comment below.
I would like to add only one point. Would you be happy with a government that said to you, you don’t have the intelligence or knowledge to understand things; so we, the government, the police and the judiciary, are going to tell you how things are and how things are to be done and you don’t have any say in it?
The principle, I repeat, the principle, is exactly the same. For AMTSO to be trusted in the good things it claims to do, it must be ultimately subject to the voice of the user.