Home > All, Politics > All-Party Parliamentary Groups and the legitimate function of an illegitimate office

All-Party Parliamentary Groups and the legitimate function of an illegitimate office

Guido’s political cynicism is legendary. But this time he’s got it wrong. He seems to suggest a conflict of interest because Patrick Mercer (MP, Newark) is paid to make security introductions to Clearwater Security while being Chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Security Group.

Guido would argue that a Chairman of an All Party Parliamentary Group for Security should not be taking money off private security firms – even if it has been declared – especially as that money is given in return for introductions to potential clients for that firm.
Mercer: Security Cash is For Client Introductions

But there is no conflict of interest. I explained this very clearly here, in relation to the All-Party IP Group:

[All-Party Groups] are really nothing more than private lobby groups essentially operating inside government, and are the opposite of democracy.
All-Party Intellectual Property Group announce [sic] new Inquiry

So a member of parliament acting undemocratically as a paid lobbyist to get private companies into parliament is not indulging in a conflict of interest provided he is doing so through an All-Party Group. Patrick Mercer is doing nothing more than fulfilling the authorised function of the All-Party Group, and as Chairman, has an even greater duty to do so.

Categories: All, Politics
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s